IG Report Blasts the Director of National Intelligence

The Director of National Intelligence has failed to exercise adequate leadership of the Intelligence Community (IC), which continues to suffer from poor integration, unjustified barriers to information sharing, and other defects, according to a remarkably critical November 2008 report of the ODNI Inspector General (pdf) that was released yesterday.

Even within the Office of the DNI, there is “declining employee confidence in ODNI leadership,” wrote Inspector General Edward Maguire.  He cited a survey which found that the number of ODNI employees reporting a “high level of respect for ODNI senior leaders” declined 10% from 2006 to 2007.

Among numerous other problem areas, the IG said that “The risk of waste and abuse has increased with a surge in government spending and a growing trend toward establishing large, complex contracts to support mission requirements throughout the IC; yet many procurements receive limited oversight because they fall below the threshold for mandatory oversight.”

The Inspector General did not address problems of overclassification in intelligence, but did call for greater efforts to combat leaks:

“The DNI should team with DoJ to develop more effective approaches to stopping the proliferation of unauthorized disclosures of classified information.  Some of these unauthorized disclosures have been extremely harmful to conducting intelligence operations and protecting sources and methods.”

The IG report also did not address continuing questions about the Intelligence Community’s compliance with the law in its surveillance and interrogation activities, but observed that “Legal issues and confusion about what the law actually requires can pose some of the greatest impediments to the IG’s national security mission.”

No Responses to “IG Report Blasts the Director of National Intelligence”

  1. Stan B April 2, 2009 at 2:45 PM #

    There is a article on this in todays LATimes. At the very end of the article what appears to be one of those throw-away line, but it is also one of those lines that leaves you hanging, wanting more info than just the one line. Could you enlighten me on what he meant by the following line ?

    “Finally, the report said that efforts to fix the nation’s eavesdropping laws have not been matched by adequate instruction to the employees engaged in that work.”
    Here’s a link to the article. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-intel-reform2-2009apr02,0,4545189.story

  2. Steven Aftergood April 2, 2009 at 4:10 PM #

    I think the sentence you cite must be a paraphrase of the section on pages 12-13 of the report about “U.S. persons,” and specifically the reference there to “Insufficient training on the handling of U.S. persons information.” But it is hard to know exactly what is behind this.

  3. Michael Hampton April 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM #

    Generally, information about U.S. persons must be “minimized,” that is, identifying information removed, before the intelligence is used or shared. As you might imagine with the massive patchwork of laws, there are lots of exceptions and rules to follow. As with anything else complex that the government does, this requires a lot of training. You can figure out the rest, I’m sure.

Leave a Reply