Vice President Makes Secrecy Policy a Joke (Literally)

The arcane details of national security classification policy became the stuff of late night comedy as White House officials struggled to justify the peculiar refusal of Vice President Dick Cheney to comply with the oversight requirements established by President Bush’s executive order on classification.

For two successive days, the White House press briefing was dominated by incredulous reporters who wondered how the Vice President could claim that he both was and was not part of the executive branch; why he complied with oversight reporting requirements in 2001 and 2002, and why he then ceased to comply; and how the Vice President’s behavior can be consistent with the executive order when the Administration’s own Information Security Oversight Office says that it is not.

“I’m not a legal scholar,” said an exasperated Dana Perino, the White House spokeswoman. “I’m not opining on his argument that his office is making.”

The story became certifiably big news last night when it was the subject of a five minute satirical segment on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart (where I had a microsecond cameo). See “Non-Executive Decision,” June 25, 2007, under “most recent videos.”

The Justice Department had said that the classification policy dispute was “under review” since Information Security Oversight Office director J. William Leonard asked the Attorney General in January 2007 to resolve the matter. But in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Justice Department revealed that no documents whatsoever had been generated by the purported review. See “A New Cheney-Gonzales Mystery” by Michael Isikoff, Newsweek, July 2.

Congressional leaders are stirring the pot, warning that the Office of Vice President could suffer budget penalties if it does not comply with routine oversight procedures. See “Secrecy May Cost Cheney, Dems Warn” by Elana Schor and Mike Soraghan, The Hill, June 26.

To recap: The internal executive branch conflict over the Vice President’s non-compliance with the executive order was triggered by a formal complaint filed with the Information Security Oversight Office in May 2006 by the Federation of American Scientists (following a report in the Chicago Tribune by Mark Silva).

The FAS complaint was accepted by ISOO Director William Leonard, and was forwarded to the Attorney General in January with his request (pdf) for an official interpretation of the executive order. There the matter lay for five months until Congressman Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, raised the issue to stratospheric heights last week with a letter to the Vice President (pdf) questioning his Office’s conduct.

The Diane Rehm Show on National Public Radio devoted an hour to the topic yesterday with Congressman Waxman, Peter Baker of the Washington Post, former Justice Department lawyer David Rivkin, and myself. See “The Executive Branch and Classified Information,” June 25.

The controversy is playing out against the backdrop of a massive four-part series in the Washington Post on Vice President Cheney’s role and conduct written by Barton Gellman and Jo Becker. The story had been under development for many months and Ms. Becker has since left the Post to go work for the New York Times. In a weird and probably unprecedented coincidence, she had a byline in front page stories in both the Washington Post and the New York Times on June 25.

No Responses to “Vice President Makes Secrecy Policy a Joke (Literally)”

  1. LENNY ZANGARDI June 26, 2007 at 12:58 PM #

    Why hasn’t Cheney been impeached? What else does he have to do to get people’s attention?

    I cannot believe Congress is focused on gay marriage while this guy is lies, cheats and steals better than anyone in history.

  2. SPENCER ADAMS June 26, 2007 at 2:40 PM #

    And the folly continues on! A couple of quotes from the Constitution and the VP, defending the secrecy of his Energy Task Force:

    ARTICLE II:
    Section 1
    The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, TOGETHER WITH (emphasis added) the Vice President, chosen for the same Term…

    “[Cheney] said that a congressional probe into the workings of his energy task force “would unconstitutionally interfere with the functioning of the executive branch.”
    from Dana Milbank in today’s WP

  3. Edward Allen June 26, 2007 at 2:54 PM #

    What right does this obscure agency in the National Archives have to order around the the executive branch? It looks to me that this is another example of an over-reaching federal agency trying to grab more and more power, without any authorization to do so. If Cheney wants to save his papers for his own personal vice presidential library, why is that any different from what Bush, Clinton, etc., have done?

    [The oversight office's authorization comes from President Bush's Executive Order 13292, section 5.1, which gives it authority to implement and oversee the entire classification system. Its directives are "binding." --SA]

  4. Christopher Grafton June 27, 2007 at 5:54 AM #

    It simply befuddles me how the American people have enabled a man who has served in a public capacity for as long as Dick Cheney has, to allow him to remain VP while he openly contradicts Constitutional facts that every American learns in the 4th grade. The position of VP is conjoined to the office of the President and the two constitute the head of the Executive Branch of government.

    Also, I find it amazing that this little fact seems to be lost when people talk about goverment documents. The government of the United States is elected by the people, and work for the people to do the people’s business. All paperwork produced, whether written or electronic and regardless of security level classification, are the property of the people. The VP has no personal claim, other then a legacy in which he can petition for copies through the FOIA like anyone else, to documents produced in the execution of his duties to the people.

  5. Mark June 27, 2007 at 4:56 PM #

    Nice reporting on this Steve. Keep it up. I’ll keep checking here for updates.